Versus Comparisons

BlueHost VS HostMonster – Which Is Better for Shared Web Hosting?

BlueHost VS HostMonster – Which Is Better for Shared Web Hosting?The comparison BlueHost VS HostMonster is for their shared web hosting mission, features, speed, reliability, technical support and price.

In fact, BlueHost and HostMonster are the sister brands, founded by Matt Heaton in 1996/1999, operated with the same staff, data centers, servers, support system and technology.

With about 15 years’ development, they have accumulated a lot of web hosting experience and knowledge.

They are the only 2 shared web hosting providers having 3 dedicated data centers in Provo, Utah that have invested 20+ million USD since 2010. They are the real leaders of the shared web hosting industry today.

RatingBlueHostHostMonster
Reputation54.5
Feature54.5
Loading Speed54
Reliability55
Tech Support54.5
Price & Value5.04.5
Read ReviewBlueHost ReviewHostMonster Review

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Features & Terms

The shared web hosting features & terms of BlueHost and HostMonster are nearly the same, except the version of specific features or technology. Take an example. By the end of May 2012, BlueHost was still using Ruby 1.8.7 and Rails 2.x, but HostMonster had upgraded to Ruby 1.9.2 and Rails 3.2.2.

FeatureBlueHostBlueHostHostMonsterHostMonster
Plans in ComparisonBasicPlusBasicPlus
Disk Space100 GBUnlimited100 GBUnlimited
BandwidthUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Free DomainYesYesYesYes
cPanelYesYesYesYes
1-Click InstallerYesYesYesYes
PHP 5YesYesYesYes
MySQL 5YesYesYesYes
Ruby on RailsYesYesYesYes
SSHYesYesYesYes
Money Back GuaranteeAnytimeAnytimeAnytimeAnytime
24/7 SupportYesYesYesYes
Discount63% Off64% Off63% Off46% Off
Effective Price$2.95/mo$3.95/mo$3.95/mo$5.95/mo

As for the basic hosting features offered by these two web hosts, you can get almost the same things with either of them.

  • Basic Features – Unless you are the bad user who overuses everything, your utilization of disk storage, RAM and bandwidth can hardly be restricted by both BlueHost and HostMonster. Even, they all allow you to host multiple domains on your hosting account along with plenty of email storage and accounts.
  • Programming and Database – These features are mainly required by some experienced developers, including the phpMyAdmin for the management of MySQL database, and some advanced programming languages such as PHP, Perl, Ruby on Rails and Python.
  • Free Extras – In order to help you market your site on the search engines easily, they all offer free ad credits that are valued up to $300. Also, if you are new to them, you can get a free domain name with any extension.
  • Ease of Use – The cPanel control panel is offered by both of them for the effective management of your website. Also, the 1-click application installer is available, combining with the control panel in a perfect manner to ease your hosting experience to a large degree.

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Loading Speed

BlueHost and HostMonster utilize the same data centers, the same servers and the same technology, their shared web hosting speed has been proven for the same by our editors. Our editors compare the loading speed of the same WordPress site with the same content hosted with BlueHost and HostMonster. We found their loading speed is nearly the same on all the database queries, page generation and page rendering, as the following statistics chart.

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Reliability

As HostMonster is more aggressive for new technology, its shared web hosting reliability is a little worse than BlueHost indeed. We have had 2 websites hosted with BlueHost and HostMonster since 2011. As the uptime statistics data collected by our website uptime monitor, BlueHost committed 99.9% uptime that the 0.1% is just for server restart or required system upgrades. Meanwhile, HostMonster committed 97.4% uptime that we usually encountered approximately 2 hours of downtime in a month.

To be frank, BlueHost is famous for its reliable hosting service. After collecting the feedbacks and reviews from their real customers, we have found that almost all of these webmasters are highly satisfied with this aspect, without any serious complaint. To ensure this, BlueHost has done the following efforts since its inception in this market.

  • All the web servers are coming with robust and branded components.
  • The infrastructure and facility of their data centers are of advanced technologies for power supply, security, monitoring and cooling.
  • They adopt the special isolation technology to separate you from all the other server users, so your allocated server resources can be guaranteed.

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Support

The BlueHost and HostMonster technical support are absolutely outstanding. They’re sharing the support staff with each other. They both provide 24×7 100% US-based technical support located in Provo, Utah via toll-free telephone, live chat, email and ticket system. With holding times that average less than 30 seconds and 100% on-site staff, you’re assured that the experienced support staff helping you know how to help.

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Price

HostMonster web hosting is starting at $9.49/mo.

BlueHost offers 3 packages named as Basic, Plus and Prime. Customers regularly need to pay $7.99/mo, $10.99/mo and $14.99/mo to get them.

Below is more detailed price information.

PriceBlueHostBlueHostHostMonsterHostMonster
Plans in ComparisonBasicPlusBasicPlus
Regularly$7.99/mo$10.99/mo$9.49/mo$10.99/mo
Discount63% Off64% Off63% Off46% Off
Price Now$2.95/mo$3.95/mo$3.95/mo$5.95/mo

BlueHost VS HostMonster > Conclusion

If you’re looking for a reliable shared web hosting provider, BlueHost or HostMonster are both a brilliant choice, but this doesn’t mean this comparison is meaningless. You can easily understand in this way, BlueHost likes new technology, but HostMonster is more aggressive to upgrade their servers for new technology.

If you’re a non-technical people looking for a shared web host for the personal staff or small businesses, BlueHost may be better than HostMonster. BlueHost is conservative, but that may help the hosting websites in a better reliable manner than HostMonster.

If you’re a developer, web designer or web development company, HostMonster may be better than BlueHost as they’re always encouraged for upgrading their servers with the latest cutting-edge technology. Take an example. HostMonster usually upgrades their servers with the latest versions of PHP and Ruby on Rails earlier than BlueHost.

Show More

Related Articles